🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that may create up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disturbing the fine equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the boundaries drawn after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

In a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its decision was written by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

This decision occurs during a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican hold. Typically, boundary revision occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several more GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic representatives lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

Another top House leader said the court had once again eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.