🔗 Share this article

At the time Microsoft announced a significant price increase for its office suite, subscribers were allegedly presented with a limited choice: either accept the increased fee with artificial intelligence tools or terminate their subscription.

According to Australia's consumer watchdog, the firm supposedly did not reveal a alternative choice that allowed users to continue accessing the software at the original price excluding the AI add-on, called Copilot.

Court Action Launched by Oversight Body

Australia's primary consumer protection agency has brought Microsoft to the national judiciary, claiming that the firm deceived approximately 2.7 million local personal and family plan customers.

The regulatory authority asserts that communications sent to subscribers only outlined a pair of options: accepting the increased fee or ending the service.

It is claimed that the company's emails and blog post were inaccurate or deceptive, conveying that consumers must agree to the more expensive AI-included plans, and the sole alternative option was to cancel, the ACCC chair, the regulatory leader, said.

Hidden Alternative Discovered

The regulator claims that a third option, referred to as standard subscriptions, was available but was not disclosed from subscribers.

This particular option allowed users to retain the features of their existing membership without Copilot at the original lower price.

Subscribers were solely presented with this option when they started terminating their subscription, according to the commission.

Price Increases and User Consequences

The annual membership cost for the software individual subscription increased by 45% from $109 to $159 AUD with the AI tool included.

The family plan experienced a twenty-nine percent rise, jumping from $139 to $179 per year.

Microsoft informed auto-renewing subscribers about the Copilot integration and upcoming cost adjustment through two emails and a online article.

We will allege in court that the company deliberately omitted reference to the standard options in its communications and concealed their availability until after subscribers started the termination procedure to boost the number of consumers on higher-priced AI-enhanced subscriptions, the chairperson continued.

Critical Applications and Limited Substitutes

The office apps included in the software packages are essential in many people's lives, and considering there are few alternatives to the combined offering, cancelling may not have been a practical option for users.

Consumers may have chosen the standard subscription if they had been aware of all the viable choices, according to the regulator.

Probe and Possible Consequences

The commission's investigation drew on a significant number of consumer reports as well as online commentary from platforms such as Reddit.

The regulatory body is seeking directives comprising penalties, injunctions, declarations, customer compensation and costs.

The highest penalty could be the larger of $50 million, triple the total benefits obtained, or 30% of the corporation's adjusted turnover during the breach timeframe.

Company Response

Customer confidence and openness are top priorities for Microsoft, and we are reviewing the commission's allegation in detail, a Microsoft spokesperson said.

We continue to be dedicated to cooperating positively with the oversight body and making certain our practices comply with all regulatory and moral standards.