🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, international health experts raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the law is enacted.

International experts in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary states the company is dedicated to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which involves growing volumes of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.